After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these systems. Via lie diagnosis tools examined at the boundary to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being employed in asylum applications. This article explores www.ascella-llc.com how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unstable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their very own capacity to get around these systems and to follow their legal right for proper protection.
It also shows how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering them from interacting with the channels of protection. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of these technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who also are disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: even though they aid to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.